중동부유럽

Since the inception of the traffic flow theory, numerous traffic flow models have been formulated by scholars in an effort to more accurately delineate the relationships between various traffic flow parameters. However, only a limited number of studies have explored the distinctions between fundamental traffic diagrams, which characterize continuous and interrupted traffic flow conditions. Addressing this research lacuna, we compared twelve “speed–density” and “flow–density” models fitted to empirical data collected under continuous and interrupted traffic flow conditions on a selected regional road in Croatia. The empirical data used to develop these models were extracted from video footage captured by an unmanned aerial vehicle on two representative road segments during characteristic peak and off-peak hours on workdays. Our analysis reveals that, depending on the selected traffic flow model and prevailing traffic flow conditions, the practical capacity of the observed regional road is estimated to be in the range from 799 to 2333 veh/h/lane. It was also discovered that the considered models reach practical capacity at a significantly different density under continuous and interrupted traffic stream conditions, i.e., between 37 and 129 veh/km/lane. The conducted t-tests underscore the need to employ distinct “speed–density” and “flow–density” regression functions for modeling continuous and interrupted traffic stream conditions.