러시아ㆍ유라시아
연구정보
[경제] Decentralized response as a pandemic second-best: The case of Russia
러시아 국외연구자료 연구보고서 Wiley Online Library 발간일 : 2023-08-25 등록일 : 2023-09-17 원문링크
자료이용안내
국내외 주요 기관에서 발표하는 자료들을 수집하여 제공하고 있습니다. 수록 자료의 자세한 내용은 해당 기관으로 문의하시기 바랍니다.
Centralized state response is almost universally considered as the first best option for managing pandemics. This paper argues that in reality, states fall short of this ideal. Knowledge problems hinder the government's disease acknowledgement, resource allocation and feedback, while compulsion, political predation, and corruption exacerbate the situation further. On the other hand, a decentralized, voluntary response may overcome knowledge problems and opportunism through effective signals such as prices, better incentives, local knowledge, and internalization of disease-related externalities. This results in a speedier, more effective, and responsive pandemic management, which also accounts for differences in risk preferences, and becomes a feasible second-best option. I then apply these insights to Russia and its history of disease management. I focus on three diseases: plague, cholera, and COVID-19, which results in a historical analysis that spans multiple centuries and different institutional settings. I show that government-led pandemic response in Russia has been riddled with knowledge problems, abuse, political predation, and violence. On the other hand, a decentralized response was quicker and more effective at managing the disease, often emerging even in the most unfavorable circumstances.
본 페이지에 등재된 자료는 운영기관(KIEP) 및 EMERiCs의 공식적인 입장을 대변하고 있지 않습니다.
| 이전글 | [국제관계] U.S.-Armenia Professional Partnership in Journalism (DOS) | 2023-09-17 |
|---|---|---|
| 다음글 | [경제] Challenges to Women’s Economic Empowerment in Rural Tajikistan: A Study fro... | 2023-09-24 |
