반복영역 건너뛰기
지역메뉴 바로가기
주메뉴 바로가기
본문 바로가기

연구정보

The liberal and republican arguments about the Law on the Expiration of the Punitive Claims of the State: a look from the position of the actors in the political system

우루과이 국외연구자료 기타 Martín Freigedo Peláez Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos 발간일 : 2015-05-07 등록일 : 2017-02-08 원문링크

자료이용안내

국내외 주요 기관에서 발표하는 자료들을 수집하여 제공하고 있습니다. 수록 자료의 자세한 내용은 해당 기관으로 문의하시기 바랍니다.

Most of the crimes against human rights committed by the Uruguayan government during the military dictatorship period remain unpunished. This is due in part, by the adoption in 1986 of Law on the Expiration of the Punitive Claims of the State, limiting the judiciary to intervene over such crimes. However, policy discussions about the violations of human rights are still present and far from an endpoint. The actors of the political system have taken very different positions over this matter with changes according to the political situation of the country. In this article, we present the liberal and republican positions of these actors to argue their attitude towards the old theoretical discussion of human rights and popular sovereignty.

 

본 페이지에 등재된 자료는 운영기관(KIEP)EMERiCs의 공식적인 입장을 대변하고 있지 않습니다.

목록